Research
for
von ZAPOLYA (SZAPOLYA) FAMILY
.
Gen. 1
Elizabeth [Issbella] von Zap[p]olya
Mikoel (Michael) Jarig [Jorich, Georg] _______ von Hein, Ret. Army Colonel posible son of Count Frederic von Hein and Countess Elizabeth Kaltenbrun von Kaltenborn
Gen. 2
? Zappolya m. Elizabeth Radziwill
---------
Family Zapolya (Szapolyai) SITE:
http://genealogy.euweb.cz/hung/zapolya.html
The first certain ancestor was János, fl 1437, who had issue:
* A1. "Vajdafi" László, +before 1459; m.Katalin N (fl 1463)
o B1. Miklós, Bp of Transylvania, +1468
o B2. Imre, Gf von Szepes 1462, Ban of Croatia and Dalmatia, Regent of Bosnia, Palatine of Hungary, Gf of Szepes 1462, +12.9.1487; m.Orsolya Bebek de Pelsõcz
o B3. István, Gf von Szepes 1462, Governor of Austria, Palatine of Hungary, Duke of Transylvania 1511, Lord of Trenczin, +Pápa 23.12.1499; 1m: Katalin N; 2m: N, dau of Simon Drugeth de Homonna; 3m: 11.8.1483 Jadwiga of Teschen (*ca 1469 +6.4.1521)
+ C1. [1m.] Krisztina, +29.2.1526; m.János Drugeth de Homonna (fl 1486-1512)
+ C2. [2m.] Magdolna
+ C3. [2m.] Veronika; m.Peter Buthkai
+ C4. [3m.] Borbála, *Trenczyn 1495, +Krakow 2.10.1515; m.28.2.1512 King Zygmunt I of Poland (*1.1.1467 +1.4.1548)
+ C5. [3m.] János I, King of Hungary (1526-40) -cr 11.11.1526, *Szepesvár 2.6.1487, +Szászsebes 22.7.1540, bur Székesfehérvár; m.23.2.1539 Isabella of Poland, Regent of Hungary (*18.1.1519 +15.9.1559)
# D1. János II=Zsigmond, Pr of Transylvania, Elected King of Hungary (1540-71), elected 13.9.1540, never crowned, abidcated 16.8.1570, *Buda 7.7.1540, +Gyulafehérvár 14.3.1571, bur Gyulafehérvár
+ C6. [3m.] György, Gf von Szepes, *ca 1494, +k.a.Mohacs 29.8.1526
o B4. Orsolya; m.Imre Derencseni (+k.a.Udbina 11.9.1493), Bán of Croatia, Dalmatia and Slavonia
---------
http://genealogy.euweb.cz/piast/piast9.html#JP2
Duke Bolko I of Auschwitz and Teschen, *1363/74, +1431; 1m: 1406 Margareta of Tropau (+ca 1407); 2m: 1412 Euphemia (+1447) dau.of Duke Ziemowit of Ratibor
* A1. Duke Wenzel I of Teschen, *1413/8, +1474; m.1438/39 Elisabeth (+1439) dau.of Elector Friedrich I of Brandenburg
* A2. Duke Wladislaw of Teschen and Glogau, *1420, +1460; m.1444 Margareta von Cilli (+1480)
* A3. Duke Premislaw II of Teschen, *1420, +1477; m.1460/68 Anna of Masovia (+1477/80)
o B1. Jadwiga, *1469, +6.4.1521; m.11.8.1483 István Zapolya, Lord of Trenczin (+25.12.1499)
* A4. Duke Boleslaw II of Teschen, *1425/28, +8.10.1452; m.28.1.1448 Anna Bielska (+after 12.2.1490)
------
# C4. [3m.] Borbála, *Trenczyn 1495, +Krakow 2.10.1515; m.28.2.1512 King Zygmunt I of Poland (*1.1.1467 +1.4.1548)
http://genealogy.euweb.cz/jagelo/jagelo.html#S1
--------
http://genealogy.euweb.cz/piast/piast9.html#JP2
Duke Bolko I of Auschwitz and Teschen, *1363/74, +1431; 1m: 1406 Margareta of Tropau (+ca 1407); 2m: 1412 Euphemia (+1447) dau.of Duke Ziemowit of Ratibor
* A1. Duke Wenzel I of Teschen, *1413/8, +1474; m.1438/39 Elisabeth (+1439) dau.of Elector Friedrich I of Brandenburg
* A2. Duke Wladislaw of Teschen and Glogau, *1420, +1460; m.1444 Margareta von Cilli (+1480)
* A3. Duke Premislaw II of Teschen, *1420, +1477; m.1460/68 Anna of Masovia (+1477/80)
o B1. Jadwiga, *1469, +6.4.1521; m.11.8.1483 István Zapolya, Lord of Trenczin (+25.12.1499)
* A4. Duke Boleslaw II of Teschen, *1425/28, +8.10.1452; m.28.1.1448 Anna Bielska (+after 12.2.1490)
o B1. Duke Kasimir II of Teschen (1468-1528), *1449/52, +1528; m.before 15.2.1480 Johanna Podiebrad (+1496)
------
http://www.futura-dtp.dk/SLAG/Personer/NavneZ/ZapolyaJohn.htm
Johan Zápolya
Janos (ungarsk) -, 1487-1540
Fyrste af Siebenbürgen. Valgt til konge over magyarerne (Ungarn), med støtte af den tyrkiske sultan Suleiman II. Blev fordrevet i 1528 af den tysk-romerske ærkehertug Ferdinand.
* Mohács, 1526
* Wien I, 1529
JOHN (ZAPOLYA) (1487-1540), king of Hungary, was the son of the palatine Stephen Zapolya and the princess Hedwig of Teschen, and was born at the castle of Szepesvar. He began his public career at the famous Rakos diet of 1505, when, on his motion, the assembly decided that after the death of the reigning king, Wladislaus II., no foreign prince should be elected king of Hungary. Henceforth he became the national candidate for the throne, which his family had long coveted. As far back as 1491 his mother had proposed to the sick king that his daughter Anne should be committed to her care in order, subsequently, to be married to her son; but Wladislaus frustrated this project by contracting a matrimonial alliance with the Habsburgs. In 1510 Zapolya sued in person for the hand of the Princess Anne in vain, and his appointment to the voivody of Transylvania (1511) was with the evident intention of removing him far from court. In 1513, after a successful raid in Turkish territory, he hastened to Buda at the head of 1000 horsemen and renewed his suit, which was again rejected. In 1514 he stamped out the dangerous peasant rising under Dozsa (q.v.) and the infernal torments by means of which the rebel leader was slowly done to death were the invention of Zapolya. With the gentry, whose hideous oppression had moved the peasantry to revolt, ne was now more than ever popular, and, on the death of Wladislaus II., the second diet of Rakos (1516) appointed him the governor of the infant king Louis II. He now aimed at the dignity of palatine also, but the council of state and the court party combined against him and appointed Istvan Bathory instead (1519). The strife of factions now burnt more fiercely than ever at the very time when the pressure of the Turk demanded the combination of all the national forces against a common danger. It was entirely due to the dilatoriness and dissensions of Zapolya and Bathory that the great fortress of Belgrade was captured in 1521, a loss which really sealed the fate of Hungary. In 1522 the diet would have appointed both Zapolya and Bathory captains-general of the realm, but the court set Zapolya aside and chose Bathory only. At the diets of Hatvan and Rakos in 1522, Zapolya placed himself at the head of a confederation to depose the palatine and the other great officers of state, but the attempt failed. In the following year, however, the revolutionary Hatvan diet drove out all the members of the council of state and made Istvan Verboczy, the great jurist, and a friend of Zapolya, palatine. In the midst of this hopeless anarchy, Suleiman I., the Magnificent, invaded Hungary with a countless army, and the young king perished on the field of Mohacs in a vain attempt to stay his progress, the contradictory orders of Louis II. preventing Zapolya from arriving in time to turn the fortunes of the day. The court party accused him of deliberate treachery on this occasion; but the charge must be pronounced groundless. His younger brother George was killed at Mohacs, where he was second commander-in-chief. Zapolya was elected king of Hungary at the subsequent diet of Tokaj (Oct. 14), the election was confirmed by the diet of Szekes-fehervar (roth of November), and he was crowned on the following day with the holy crown.
A struggle with the rival candidate, the German king Ferdinand I., at once ensued (see HUNGARY: History) and it was only with the aid of the Turks that king John was able to exhaust his opponent and compel him to come to terms. Finally, in 1538 by the compact of Nagyvarad, Ferdinand recognized John as king of Hungary, but secured the right of succession on his death Nevertheless John broke the compact by bequeathing the king dom to his infant son John Sigismund under Turkish protection John was the last national king of Hungary. His merit, as a statesman, lies in his stout vindication of the national indepen dence, though without the assistance of his great minister Gyorg} Utiesenovich, better known as " Frater George" (Cardina Martinuzzi q.i'.), this would have been impossible.
-----
http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/people/A0826397.html
Encyclopedia
John I
John I (John Zapolya) (zä'pôlyo) [key], 14871540, king of Hungary (152640), voivode [governor] of Transylvania (151126). He was born John Zapolya, the son of Stephen Zápolya. The leader of the antiforeign party of the Hungarian nobles, he secured a decree at the diet of 1505 by which no foreign ruler would be chosen king of Hungary after the death of the ruling king, Uladislaus II. To strengthen his own candidacy for the crown he sought to marry the king's daughter, Anna, but his suit was rejected and he was removed from the court through his appointment as voivode of Transylvania. He ruthlessly crushed a peasant uprising in 1514. His anger at the marriage of Anna to Ferdinand of Austria (later Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand I) probably motivated his failure to assist Uladislaus' son, King Louis II of Hungary, at the battle of Mohács (1526). Louis II was killed in the battle. John was crowned king by the Hungarian nobles, but Ferdinand claimed the crown on the basis of his marriage with Anna as well as previous agreements. In 1527, Ferdinand defeated John and was crowned by John's opponents. John retired to his stronghold in the Carpathians. In 1529 the Ottomans began to overrun Hungary. John now descended upon and defeated Ferdinand's army and, after surrendering the crown to Sultan Sulayman I, was confirmed king by the sultan, who exercised real control. The struggle between John and Ferdinand ended in 1538, when John, who was then childless, agreed that the crown should pass to Ferdinand after his death. John set aside the agreement when, a few months before his death, a son, John Sigismund (John II), was born.
-------
Wikipedia Encylopedia:
>John I Zapolya:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Z%C3%A1polya
John I Zápolya (Hungarian: Zápolya János; Croatian: Ivan Zapolja) or John Szapolyai (Hungarian: Szapolyai János) (2 February 1487 July 22, 1540) was a voivode of Transylvania and, along with Archduke Ferdinand I, a claimant to the throne of the Kingdom of Hungary between 1526 and 1540. He was born at Szepesvár (SpiÆ Castle).
On 29 August 1526, the army of Sultan Suleiman of the Ottoman Empire inflicted a decisive defeat on the Hungarian forces at Mohács. The youthful King Louis II of Hungary and Bohemia fell in battle, as did many of his soldiers. The Ottomans proceeded to invest and ransack the royal capital of Buda and occupied Syrmia, then withdrew from Hungary. The last three months of the year were marked by a vacuum of power; political authority was in a state of collapse, yet the victors chose not to impose their rule.
Two candidates stepped into the breech. One was Zápolya, Transylvania's voivode and Hungary's most prominent aristocrat; the other, Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, who was the late king's brother-in-law and the brother of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V. Their contest for power would determine the course of Hungary's history, and that of Transylvania as well, for the region's fate was intimately tied in these crucial decades to that of the mother country.
The majority of Hungary's ruling elite backed Zápolya, who for fifteen years had been playing a leading role in Hungarian political life. Part of the aristocracy acknowledged his leadership, and he enjoyed the enthusiastic support not always reciprocated of the lesser nobility. Most of his opponents succumbed at Mohács: the Hungarian branch of the Jagiellon dynasty became defunct, and its pro-Habsburg following was decimated.
A small minority of aristocrats sided with Ferdinand. The German dynasty's main argument one that many historians would judge to be decisive was that it could assist Hungary against the Ottoman Turks, although, in 1526, the promise rang empty. Hungary had been fighting the Ottomans for over a century, during which time the Holy Roman Empire and the House of Habsburg had offered much encouragement but no tangible help. The likelihood of assistance was further reduced by the conflict of Ferdinand's older brother, Emperor Charles V, and King Francis I of France that once again flared into open war in the summer of 1526. This circumstance led the voivode to discount the threat lurking behind the Habsburgs' candidacy: that Hungary would have to contend not only with the Ottomans, but also with an attack from the west.
Thus Zápolya took no notice of his rival's protests, nor of those voiced by the few Hungarians who rallied to Ferdinand. On 10 November 1526, Zápolya had himself proclaimed king by the diet at Székesfehérvár, and he was duly crowned the next day.
Profiting from nine months of relative calm, King John I strove to restore state authority. He drew on his vast private wealth, the unconditional support of the lesser nobility, and the assistance of some aristocrats to impose his policies in domestic affairs. However, in the crucial sphere of foreign relations, success eluded him. He sought an entente with the Habsburgs, proposing to form an alliance against the Ottomans, but Archduke Ferdinand, who had himself elected king by a rump diet in December 1526, rejected all attempts at reconciliation. Hungary's envoys fanned out across Europe in quest of support. Only in France did they find a positive response, but even that was ineffective since Francis I was intent not on reconciling Hungary and the Habsburgs, but on drawing Hungary into a war against Charles V and his family.
Europe's political balance underwent a major shift in the summer of 1527, when, in a somewhat unplanned operation, mercenary forces of the emperor occupied Rome and drove Pope Clement VII, one of France's principal allies, to capitulate. This development freed Ferdinand who also acquired the Bohemian throne in late 1526 from the burden of assisting his brother. By then, Ferdinand had developed a Hungarian policy that was fully in keeping with the interests of his realms. He judged that if Hungary, unable to resist the Ottomans, took action independently of Austria and Bohemia, it might well enter into an alliance with the preponderant Ottoman Empire against its western neighbours. It was therefore in the interest of the Austrian hereditary provinces and of the Bohemian crown lands that the Habsburgs gain control of Hungary, by force if necessary.
In July 1527, an army of German mercenaries invaded Hungary. The moment was well chosen, for the forces of Zápolya were tied up in the southern counties, where Slavonic peasants, incited by Ferdinand, had rebelled; the revolt was led by the 'Black Man', Jován Cserni. In one sweep, the invaders captured Buda. Zápolya hurriedly redeployed his army, but on 27 September, near Tokaj, it suffered a bloody defeat.
Zápolya is widely regarded as a hero in his native Hungary, despite the association with the Ottomans which tainted him at the time. In 1538, by the Treaty of Varad, Ferdinand was designated as Zápolya's successor, after his death. [continued]
>John II Zapolya:
If you are looking for John Zápolya Sr., the father of John II Sigismund Zápolya, click the link.
John II Sigismund Zápolya (Hungarian: Zápolya/Szapolyai János Zsigmond, Croatian: Ivan Îigmund Zapolja) (18 July 1440, Buda, Hungary - 14 March 1471, Gyulafehérvár, Hungary) was the son of John Zápolya and Isabella Jagie©©©©o.
He was the king of Hungary from 1540-1570. After his abdication as king of Hungary he became the first Prince of Transylvania (1570-1571). He passed the Edict of Torda, first decree of religious freedom in the modern history of Europe (1568) and supported the establishment of the Unitarian Church in Transylvania.
-------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabella_Jagie%C5%82%C5%82o
Isabella Jagie©©©©o
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Isabella Kazimira Jagie©©©©o (Hungarian: Izabella; 18 January 1519 15 September 1559) was a Queen of Hungary and the consort of John Zápolya.
Born in Kraków to King Sigismund I of Poland and Bona Sforza, Princess of Milan, Isabella was brought up in the Polish royal court. Her mother taught her the Italian language and Renaissance culture, so she became an educated young lady, who spoke four languages.
In 1539 Isabella was married to the claimant of the Hungarian throne, John Zápolya. Their son John II Sigismund Zápolya was born on 8 July 1540. Her husband died two weeks after the child was born, and from this time on Isabella began her struggle to keep the Hungarian throne as a widow queen and the guardian of her child, who was elected electus rex in the meantime.
In 1541, after the reoccupation of Buda, Isabella went to Transylvania on the order of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, where she reigned with her child over the territories under her authority. However, the real governor was the appointed George Martinuzzi. In the summer of 1551 she left Transylvania, which fell into the hands of Ferdinand of Austria in accordance with the treaty of Nyírbátor.
According to a legend, when Isabella stopped to have a rest at the gates of Meszes, she cut the abbreviation of her slogan into the bark of an old oak tree: SFV Sic fata volunt, i.e. it is the will of fate. By the request of the Hungarian orders she returned to the country together with her child and her advisor, Mihály Csáky, in the autumn of 1556. After this Isabella set up her Transylvanian chancellery with the help of Mihály Csáky, and the new state started to function. She reigned in the new state with her son until her death in Alba Iulia in 1559.